• To: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?
• From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 22:05:01 +0100
• In-reply-to: <200302242255.RAA01279@m...>
• References: <200302242255.RAA01279@m...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130

John Cowan wrote:
> (and ISO 3166 countries include many that don't belong to
> the U.N., notably Switzerland, BTW)

If this statement is parsed to mean that Switzerland is
not an UN member, this is no longer correct. Update your
records :-)

J.Pietschmann

• References:
  • Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Next by Date: Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?
• Next by thread: RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread