• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: On permathreads
• From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:22:36 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <3E5BA450.6070209@e...>

Given that people recognize that there are these things called
permathreads how will we go about ordering them? It seems to me that
xml-dev should be the one list where it would be possible to abstract up
to the next level and provide some tools/possibilities for permathread
management? 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: On permathreads
    • From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@a...>

• References:
  • Some notes on the binxml permathread (was: Re: Parsingefficiency? - why not 'compile'????)
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
• Next by Date: Re: On permathreads
• Previous by thread: Some notes on the binxml permathread (was: Re: Parsingefficiency? - why not 'compile'????)
• Next by thread: Re: On permathreads
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread