• To: Martin Soukup <martin@d...>
• Subject: Re: Parsing Performance
• From: Dennis Sosnoski <dms@s...>
• Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 10:56:04 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <000901c2dbfc$a11821b0$6c64a8c0@DOGGIE>
• References: <000901c2dbfc$a11821b0$6c64a8c0@DOGGIE>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130

Martin Soukup wrote:

>Live data feeds. Yes, I think you might be right, but what option do I
>have other than SAX?
>
Your best non-SAX option is probably XMLPull (http://www.xmlpull.org). 
The two packaged implementations do not support DTDs, though if you need 
DTD support there's also a link for CVS code to an implementation based 
on Xerces. I haven't tried out the Xerces-based implementation, but use 
the XPP3 one all the time - it's as fast as the fastest SAX2 parsers, 
and for many applications the XMLPull API is much easier to work with 
than SAX.

  - Dennis

• References:
  • RE: Parsing Performance
    • From: "Martin Soukup" <martin@d...>

• Prev by Date: DOM support in IE vs. NS
• Next by Date: RE: Parsing Performance
• Previous by thread: RE: Parsing Performance
• Next by thread: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread