• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 17:05:37 -0500
• In-reply-to: <01b501c2d795$a55fe7a0$b8941bac@h...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EEEACF3B@h...> <200302181620.31109.gtn@r...> <01b501c2d795$a55fe7a0$b8941bac@h...>
• User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

On Tuesday 18 February 2003 04:35 pm, Hugh Wallis wrote:
> That's what XBRL is all about [1]. As an example various banks are
> providing discounts to loan applicants who submit their applications tagged
> in XBRL. This provides an incentive to the data provider to use this
> format. Software is being created to facilitate that so the underpaid data
> entry clerk never needs to see a pointy bracket. Various existing
> accounting software is implementing 'export to XBRL' type features to
> relieve the burden.

How long until XBRL is ubiquitous, and what happens then?

• References:
  • RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
  • Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
    • From: "Hugh Wallis" <hugh_wallis@h...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Next by thread: RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread