• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 15:12:49 -0500
• In-reply-to: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F804B54CA1@R...>

dareo@m... (Dare Obasanjo) writes:
>The people who process XML with strongly typed languages (e.g. Java &
>C# folks) are all about strongly typed XML while those who process it
>with weakly typed languages (Perl & Python folks) are for weak typing
>in XML. Or at least that has been the case in the XML-DEV discussions
>I've seen. 

That's funny, since I was a Java person long before I was an XML person.
There may be more diversity in those communities than expected.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• References:
  • RE: Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing
• Next by Date: Re: Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing
• Previous by thread: RE: Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing
• Next by thread: Re: Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread