• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative
• From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 08:08:58 -0800
• In-reply-to: <oprj2r11daezizxn@s...>
• References: <oprj2r11daezizxn@s...> <20030204120457.4f6c3eea.code_martial@s...> <p04330103ba65690e85d6@[192.168.254.4]>

Mike Champion wrote:

> Here's just a couple tidbits from today's surfing
> http://www.bea.com/events/webservices/Bosworth_WSRC_Jan03.pdf -- an Adam
> Bosworth "vision thing" piece.  Note p. 43 about XML databases (and
> obviously the middleware and applications they support) serving up XML
> messages/fragments/state thousands of times per second. How sure are we
> that bandwidth/parsing performance is not a bottleneck in such a scenario?

Profile the code?



--Joe English

  jenglish@f...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• References:
  • Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative
    • From: Tahir Hashmi <code_martial@s...>
  • Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPath position in XSLT
• Next by Date: Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative
• Previous by thread: Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative
• Next by thread: Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread