• To: james.fuller@o...
• Subject: Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 10:09:38 -0500
• Cc: code_martial@s..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <45951.213.123.177.163.1044369605.squirrel@w...>
• References: <p04330103ba65690e85d6@[192.168.254.4]> <45951.213.123.177.163.1044369605.squirrel@w...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130

How much of the problem "XML needs to be compressed" is solved by just 
using GZIP transfer encoding over HTTP?
	/r$

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
  • Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative
    • From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@a...>

• References:
  • Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative
    • From: "James Fuller" <james.fuller@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative
• Next by Date: RE: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative
• Previous by thread: Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative
• Next by thread: Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread