• To: robin.berjon@e...
• Subject: Re: Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re:
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:54:45 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: mc@x... (Mike Champion), xml-dev@l... (XML Dev)
• In-reply-to: <3E5B9613.7080700@e...> from "Robin Berjon" at Feb 25, 2003 05:13:07 PM

Robin Berjon scripsit:

> The proverbial Desperate Perl Hacker uses SAX and DOM, just like everybody else 
> (with the notable exception that there are more than those two options available 
> to him, mostly through partial trees or simplified trees -- alternate infosets 
> if you will).

I do lots of things with XML documents and almost never parse any; OTOH, I
never deal with XML documents from unknown sources, either.  For me,
parsing is a method of ensuring that my output is compliant.

I am also the xml-dev Official Desperate Fgrep Hacker.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• References:
  • Re: Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: The subsetting has begun)
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Next by Date: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Previous by thread: Re: Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: The subsetting has begun)
• Next by thread: Re: Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: The subsetting has begun)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread