• To: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>,Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Subject: Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch
• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 14:37:03 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20030223183710.00b085f8@m...>
• References: <5.1.0.14.0.20030222193255.00b1ade0@m...><5.1.0.14.0.20030222193255.00b1ade0@m...><5.1.0.14.0.20030223183710.00b085f8@m...>

At 6:46 PM +0000 2/23/03, Sean McGrath wrote:

>Actually, SGML was probably different. It allowed you to be 100% 
>compliant but leave out pretty much everything :-)

Sounds like the XML Infoset to me.

At OOP 2003 last month I demoed an Infoset conformant kangaroo:

http://cafeconleche.org/slides/oop2003/xmlandjava/36.html

This e-mail contains no information items, and is therefore 100% 
Infoset conformant.
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|           Processing XML with Java (Addison-Wesley, 2002)          |
|              http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xmljava             |
| http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0201771861/cafeaulaitA  |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/    |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+

• References:
  • re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
  • Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch
• Next by Date: Re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch
• Previous by thread: Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch
• Next by thread: xml/xsl won't display when used online
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread