• To: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• Subject: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>
• Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 22:55:48 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <87ptpoclv2.fsf@n...>
• References: <871y252nza.fsf@n...> <5.2.0.9.0.20030219101310.0338bc60@n...> <87ptpoclv2.fsf@n...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130

Norman Walsh wrote:
> I think markup is about concreteness: that's
> a filename, that's a command, that's a paragraph, and that's a
> footnote.

Unfortunately, "paragraph" and "footnote" are not on the same
abstraction level as "filename" or "command". However, they are
close to level of abstraction of "text displayed in monospace
font"

J.Pietschmann

• References:
  • Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
  • Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Open Source or Else
• Next by Date: RE: Open Source or Else
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread