• To: 'Gavin Thomas Nicol' <gtn@r...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 16:35:03 -0600

Ok, that is a deeper issue.  I am assuming 
the expert designed the schema for the 
customer, not that he gave them one from 
a standard set.   It depends on the tool 
as to how useful that is as an editing 
hint.

Or did I misunderstand your point?  

len

From: Gavin Thomas Nicol [mailto:gtn@r...]

On Tuesday 18 February 2003 05:01 pm, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> Not exactly although I agree that when using
> XML as The GUI, it looks the same.  The namespace
> should enable me to stay consistent with the
> driving schema.

What if I don't care? What if my system maps Nikon to the appropriate URI 
because I choose to interpret the manufacturer attribute as something 
containing an SOI?

I don't need a *standard* to tell me what a namespace means. What I need is a 
means for dealing with them once I recognize them.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread