• To: veillard@r...
• Subject: Re: RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave
• From: MURATA Makoto <murata@h...>
• Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 01:34:35 +0900
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <20030217080054.X29764@r...>
• References: <20030217080054.X29764@r...>

On Mon, 17 Feb 2003 08:00:54 -0500
Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...> wrote:
 
>   So one would expect identical name to be identical nameclasses.
> However, both the Relax NG tutorial and the test suite exhibit
> RelaxNG schemas like 
...> 
>   If someone has an answer, I'm interested !

RELAX NG Tutorial Errata addresses this problem.

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/relax-ng/errata/tutorial-errata.html

To my surprise, this document is not linked from the RELAX NG tutorial.  
An older version of the errata (which is empty) is linked instead.
Sorry for the inconvenience.

>   Okay in the absence of an answer to my subscription request and
> mail to the RelaxNG list 2 weeks ago, I'm sorry to bounce this problem
> to XML-Dev, but I see no other channel to discuss this. If someone
> has the fortunate access to a RelaxNG list open for discussion feel
> free to act as a gateway :-\

Have you tried relax-ng@l... or relax-ng-comment@l...?

Cheers,

-- 
MURATA Makoto <murata@h...>

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>

• References:
  • RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>

• Prev by Date: RE: BOXED XML (was RE: Re: Remembering the original XML vision)
• Next by Date: Re: RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave
• Previous by thread: RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave
• Next by thread: Re: RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread