• To: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>
• Subject: Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:17:00 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <20030210105344.K2173@w...>
• References: <57EF69AF56D92148984EDA3174082945040F9930@R...> <20030209203244.J2173@w...> <E18iEMD-0007Ln-00@c...> <20030210105344.K2173@w...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130

> DNS was based on a "proper protocol", ONC RPC.

That's a new one to me -- what makes you say that?  (I don't even think 
you can express DNS packets in XDR, but I could be wrong there.)

> There is *VERY* little value in standardizing on a layer 6 protocol
> (note to Rich; BEEP is layer 5/6, not layer 7), even if it's done well
> like BEEP.

Oh this is so wrong.  Cf RFC 3117.
	/r$

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • RE: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
    • From: "Don Box" <dbox@m...>
  • Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
    • From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>
  • Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
    • From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@a...>
  • Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
    • From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
• Next by Date: Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
• Previous by thread: Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
• Next by thread: Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread