• To: wperry@f... (W. E. Perry)
• Subject: Re: The subsetting has begun
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:25:39 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: xml-dev@l... (XML DEV)
• In-reply-to: <3E5FC7A9.43FF7F9D@f...> from "W. E. Perry" at Feb 28, 2003 03:33:45 PM

W. E. Perry scripsit:

> As last week's discussion made clear, such processors are non-conformant to
> the XML Rec. That is the reason de jure not to create documents intended for
> such processors and then call either those documents or those processors
> 'XML'.

Let's not overdo it here.  Such processors are not XML, but the documents
they accept certainly are.

-- 
A rabbi whose congregation doesn't want         John Cowan
to drive him out of town isn't a rabbi,         http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
and a rabbi who lets them do it                 jcowan@r...
isn't a man.    --Jewish saying                 http://www.reutershealth.com

• References:
  • Re: The subsetting has begun
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The waterfall model lives?
• Next by Date: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Previous by thread: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Next by thread: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread