• To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>
• Subject: Re: collisions (was The subsetting has begun)
• From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 19:29:16 -0500
• Cc: Joe English <jenglish@f...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F804B54D50@R...>; from dareo@m... on Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 04:20:35PM -0800
• References: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F804B54D50@R...>
• Reply-to: veillard@r...
• User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 04:20:35PM -0800, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> Exactly what is wrong with the "Project Record in XML" from a document
> design perspective? 

  yep, I'm wondering too :-)

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@r...  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

• References:
  • RE: collisions (was The subsetting has begun)
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: collisions (was The subsetting has begun)
• Next by Date: RE: collisions (was The subsetting has begun)
• Previous by thread: RE: collisions (was The subsetting has begun)
• Next by thread: Re: collisions (was The subsetting has begun)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread