• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: XML parser bencmark to compare .NET parser and Java parser?
• From: "Owen Walcher" <news@o...>
• Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 20:00:10 -0700
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0302032034470.21449-100000@s...>

Network Associates had the same language in their license agreement, and it
was found to be un-enforceable.


-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Salz [mailto:rsalz@d...]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 6:36 PM
To: Dennis Sosnoski
Cc: Jenny Wong; xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re:  XML parser bencmark to compare .NET parser and
Java parser?


> Unfortunately the .NET SDK
> license agreement prohibits reporting the results of any benchmark
> testing without Microsoft's prior written approval

What a crock of s--t.

NY just got a ruling against someone (Oracle?) for just this sort
of thing.  Anyone there want to try it?
        /r$


-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>

• References:
  • Re: XML parser bencmark to compare .NET parser and Javaparser?
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML parser bencmark to compare .NET parser and Javaparser?
• Next by Date: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative
• Previous by thread: Re: XML parser bencmark to compare .NET parser and Javaparser?
• Next by thread: Re: XML parser (angry - don't read!)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread