• To: "'Dare Obasanjo'" <dareo@m...>, "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>, XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Registered Namespace prefixes
• From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>
• Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:26:36 -0800

> Namespace prefixes are a syntactic shortcut that should not have been
> blessed with being a [property] in the XML Infoset 

That's another way to fix the problem, I agree.

> let alone something
> as bass-ackwards as elevating some of them to having "registered"
> status. I'd never advice anyone I know to participate in such 
> a venture.

The only elevation is to say: "This is mine. It is unique."  And, maybe:
"Here's my RDDL doc".

• Prev by Date: RE: Registered Namespace prefixes
• Next by Date: RE: Registered Namespace prefixes
• Previous by thread: Re: Registered Namespace prefixes
• Next by thread: RE: Registered Namespace prefixes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread