• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: pure XML syntax tools
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 09:24:50 -0500
• In-reply-to: <oprk4q34aeezizxn@s...>

mc@x... (Mike Champion) writes:
>I'm sure there's a few thousand people out there who would be happy
>users of pure syntax XML tools such as SAX,

Hmm... SAX may be close to the document, but it's certainly not a "pure
XML syntax tool" unless perhaps the Infoset is as well.  

See, for example, Appendix B of David Brownell's _SAX2_, which is a
direct comparison of the SAX2 API to the various items in the Infoset.
Not a perfect match, but the flavors are clearly similar.

(I'm working on an API that's basically strings + context.  I'm not even
sure that will qualify as a pure XML syntax tool, but we'll see.
Time... need time!)

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• References:
  • Re: The subsetting has begun
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Next by Date: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Previous by thread: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Next by thread: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread