[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 13:32:00 -0500 (EST), John Cowan 
<cowan@m...> wrote:


>> The people behind sml-dev got this right, technically and economically - 
>> they specified the subset for everyone's use. Perhaps similar work could 
>> be chartered by the W3C,
>
> It has been.

Uhh, are you talking about "There may, however, be a need for having a 
finer classification that would distinguish the various non-validating 
processors: for example, those that expand external parsed entities from 
those that don't." in http://www.w3.org/2001/12/xmlbp/xml-core-wg- 
charter.html#deliverables?  That's giving the Core WG permission to look 
into subsetting / conformance profiling if they want to, not chartering 
them to go forth and do so, as I understand it.  Were you thinking of 
something else?

  


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member