• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity
• From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 18:50:28 GMT
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <006301c2d90b$98dc0960$9e539696@citkwaclaww2k>
• Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh

>Why not store the entity declarations in a hash table, hashed by name?

Yes, that might be a good way to do it.

Of course the entity declarations will have the (maybe absolutized)
system ID rather than the maybe-redirected retrieval URI, since they
aren't normally fetched at the time they're declared.

But at least I would know which were external entities.  (Internal
entity boundaries are not relevant to base URI calculation.)

When I started, I wasn't expecting to have to look at the entity
declarations at all!

-- Richard

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity
    • From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>

• References:
  • Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity
    • From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity
• Next by Date: Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity
• Next by thread: Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread