• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the original XML vision)
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:35:44 -0500
• In-reply-to: <3E4FC824.4040208@t...>
• References: <7c.35a8563b.2b7ff77d@a...><06cb01c2d5b0$d0073990$4bc8a8c0@A...><3E4FC824.4040208@t...>
• User-agent: Opera7.0/Win32 M2 build 2637

On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 09:19:32 -0800, Tim Bray <tbray@t...> wrote:


> Fair enough, but if you remove all the unicode-character apparatus from 
> XML 1.0 you probably cut that in half.  Which is one of the only 
> important *technical* differences between XML and SGML - SGML was really 
> underspecified on what a "character" was.  At the end of the day XML's 
> main technical contribution may turn out to have been that it dragged 
> Unicode into the mainstream.

Stupid question:  Why couldn't XML incorporate Unicode by reference rather 
than spending half of the spec defining the "unicode-character apparatus"?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the original XML vision)
    • From: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@a...>
  • Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the original XML vision)
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
  • Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering theoriginal XML vision)
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• References:
  • Re: Remembering the original XML vision
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
  • Re: Remembering the original XML vision
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Remembering the original XML vision
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Remembering the original XML vision
• Next by Date: Re: Remembering the original XML vision
• Previous by thread: Re: Remembering the original XML vision
• Next by thread: Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering theoriginal XML vision)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread