• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: poisoned markup
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 21:42:53 -0500
• In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0302022133260.5859-100000@s...>

rsalz@d... (Rich Salz) writes:

>> On
>> the other hand, there's plenty of reason for those of us who do care
>> about markup to detest those who just care about serialization - and 
>> to fight back when possible.
>
>Wow.
>
>This is one of the few time I find myself looking forward to Monday
>morning in the hopes it will inject a little sanity into the
>discussion.

If you're not up for conflict, don't walk into a territory thinking you
own it.

http://www.advogato.org/person/simonstl/diary.html?start=44

It's long past time for a fork.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• References:
  • Re: poisoned markup
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: poisoned markup
• Next by Date: Re: poisoned markup
• Previous by thread: Re: poisoned markup
• Next by thread: Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread