• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services)
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 11:38:17 -0500
• In-reply-to: <E18fMWI-0005cS-00@b...>

uche.ogbuji@f... (Uche Ogbuji) writes:
>So go, be fruitful and multiply your data expression languages.  I
>won't argue for anyone to stop.  Just don't try to impose upon the
>rest of us all this welter of varying fruit.

Does writing parsers that ignore DOCTYPE constitute an imposition?  That
seemed to be one of the key problems last time around, but I suspect
it's an important first step, uh, forward.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• References:
  • Re: SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services)
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services)
• Next by Date: Re: SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services)
• Previous by thread: Re: SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services)
• Next by thread: Re: SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread