• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: The subsetting has begun
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 10:45:46 -0800
• Thread-index: AcLc/Fw4Bc8M9p7lRuGH5N+y4PN17wAAYFxw
• Thread-topic: The subsetting has begun

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...] 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 10:34 AM
> To: xml-dev@l...
> 
> I'm amazed in large part because of the horrible but "technically XML"
> mishmashes I regularly encounter which are quite obviously 
> the result of a collision between an internal object 
> structure and the infoset.  It's not just one company or even 
> one category of companies - it's pretty common.

Probably no more amazed than I by the horrible but "technically
relational" databases that people design or horrible but "techically
object oriented" programs that people write. That's the price you pay
for popularity. 


-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Drive defensively--buy a tank.                                 

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: The subsetting has begun
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Call for information about XML-Fragments
• Next by Date: RE: On permathreads
• Previous by thread: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Next by thread: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread