Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Karl Waclawek wrote: > I like the point made about random access. Sort of like an indexed > version of an XML document. Not necessarily indexed per se, but it's easy to skip large parts of a document because you know that it doesn't contain what you want. > I don't quite understand how binXML gives you better streaming, > in the sense of sending fragments. Isn't that done on the application > level? Yes and no. XML doesn't stream all that well, because it doesn't fragment very well (you always need to send entire documents). For applications that can tune into a stream that has already started (any broadcast app for instance), that means they'd need to wait til the end of the current doc before they can start displaying anything. With binary infosets, that's not the case anymore. You can also update parts of a document more often than others and other such niceties. A lot of it is dependent on the transport layer, but binary infosets make that possible. I'm eagerly awaiting my first SVG TV ;) -- Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...> Research Engineer, Expway http://expway.fr/ 7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE 8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488
|
