Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 16:33:38 -0500, Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...> wrote: > It might be some improvement (is it better to reject some well-formed > documents or accept some malformed ones?) but not enough. I'm not > willing to settle for less than full conformance to the minimum level of > XML 1.0. I for one would find it very interesting if they were to implement the XML- SW profile, as long as they call it a subset of XML 1.0 of course, and don't imply that it will ever have standing as a W3C Recommendation. BTW, if the J2ME folks who may be listening don't catch the reference to "XML- SW" we're talking about http://www.textuality.com/xml/xmlSW.html. I suspect Tim will be happiest if people pay very careful attention to the "Status of this document" section :-)
|
