• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 08:51:15 -0500
• In-reply-to: <874r712o55.fsf@n...>
• References: <r01050400-1023-3DB9B465435C11D78AAD0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]><5.2.0.9.0.20030218115729.02f1c7a0@n...><874r712o55.fsf@n...>

Norman Walsh writes:

 > If I was you, I'd write the darn thing in XML and then run it through
 > some tool to produce Word. Arbortext's Epic product would be ideal, I
 > think.[*]

It's even easier to get to RTF.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson, david@m..., http://www.megginson.com/

• References:
  • Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread