• To: <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Subject: Re: Anyone wanna speculate about what this means?
• From: Berend de Boer <berend@x...>
• Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 08:28:02 +1300
• Cc: "'XML Dev'" <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <000001c2d668$c16b9030$6401a8c0@pcukmka> ("Michael Kay"'smessage of "Mon, 17 Feb 2003 09:41:32 -0000")
• References: <000001c2d668$c16b9030$6401a8c0@pcukmka>
• User-agent: Gnus/5.090014 (Oort Gnus v0.14) Emacs/21.2(i386-msvc-nt5.0.2195)

>>>>> "MK" == Michael Kay <michael.h.kay@n...> writes:

    MK> XQuery will definitely give benefits, though, when searching
    MK> large indexed databases. I think there are sound technical
    MK> reasons why XQuery is more amenable to that kind of
    MK> optimization than XSLT is: and in any case, I don't see anyone
    MK> trying to produce an XSLT implementation that can handle this
    MK> scenario.

Could you expand a bit on those "sound technical reasons"? I just
finished doing an XPath implementation on top of a database. As I
understood it, XPath expressions form the basis for XQuery as well as
XSLT, so the distinction should be in xSLT specific things, right?

-- 
Regards,

Berend. (-:

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Anyone wanna speculate about what this means?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
  • Re: Anyone wanna speculate about what this means?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• References:
  • RE: Anyone wanna speculate about what this means?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave
• Next by Date: Re: Safari and XSLT
• Previous by thread: RE: Anyone wanna speculate about what this means?
• Next by thread: Re: Anyone wanna speculate about what this means?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread