• To: Jeff.Lowery@c... (Jeff Lowery)
• Subject: Re: Registered Namespace prefixes
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:31:12 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: mbatsis@n... ("'Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)'"), Jeff.Lowery@c... (Jeff Lowery), xml-dev@l... (xml-dev)
• In-reply-to: <4827EC373E03DB44AC2AB3900430896B026605@w...> from "Jeff Lowery" at Feb 26, 2003 01:14:54 PM

Jeff Lowery scripsit:

> Notice that I said that a URI is optional for a registered prefix!

In fact such a registry will wish to list the registered prefixes in a Web
accessible registry of some sort, and so the new proposal amounts to the
old one reborn: for every prefix (in context) there is a URI.

-- 
We call nothing profound                        jcowan@r...
that is not wittily expressed.                  John Cowan
        --Northrop Frye (improved)              http://www.reutershealth.com

• References:
  • RE: Registered Namespace prefixes
    • From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Registered Namespace prefixes
• Next by Date: XML Catalog support for .Net (and others)
• Previous by thread: RE: Registered Namespace prefixes
• Next by thread: RE: Registered Namespace prefixes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread