Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 09:38 am, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: > I agree that less needs to be in the subset > and it really needs to be a subset, not a > wholesale restart on the core, but > it represents a point of view and from > people who took on the task before. Sure, as a platform for debate, XML-SW is a fine starting point. I think there are probably a few other such platforms too: CommonXML being one, and XML-SW minus all the bits I discussed could be another. FWIW. Both you and I participated in the early XML efforts, as did a fairly significant set of other people. That alone doesn't buy credibility. > It is worth looking at because it mirrors > positions about what a core should be that > will have to be dealt with sooner or later. Yes. We've already seen that it's somewhat contentious as it stands.
|
