• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: The subsetting has begun
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 04:38:26 +1100
• References: <5.1.0.14.0.20030226160545.0207fd18@m...> <5.1.0.14.0.20030226160545.0207fd18@m...> <5.1.0.14.0.20030226162932.01e92ac8@m...>

From: "Sean McGrath" <sean.mcgrath@p...>


> At 16:21 26/02/2003 +0000, Alaric B. Snell wrote:
> > >It's not a DAG; you can't share subtrees. It's a tree!
> 
> Yes. My mistake. Thanks.
 
SGML is more of a DAG, because of CONREF.  Sharing branches
is one thing XML gave up.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• References:
  • RE: The subsetting has begun
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
  • Re: The subsetting has begun
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
• Next by Date: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Previous by thread: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Next by thread: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread