• To: bill@d... (Bill de hÓra)
• Subject: Re: The subsetting has begun
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:07:10 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: dareo@m... (Dare Obasanjo), Jeff.Lowery@c... (Jeff Lowery), clbullar@i... ("Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)"), xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3E5AAC26.1040500@d...> from "Bill de hÓra" at Feb 24, 2003 11:35:02 PM

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?= scripsit:
> 
> Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> >  However as many proposals for
> > alternate syntaxes for XML (including binary ones) have shown this
> > doesn't mean that XML infosets necessarily have to be
> > UnicodeWithAngleBrackets. 
> 
> That infoset is an abstract content model, or a plain ole syntax 
> tree. Drop the 'XML'; it's superfluous.

<span tone="huffy">I suppose you think it's just an accident that the
Infoset happens to talk about elements, attributes, processing instructions,
namespaces, etc.?</span>

-- 
John Cowan                              <jcowan@r...>
http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              http://www.reutershealth.com
                Charles li reis, nostre emperesdre magnes,
                Set anz totz pleinz ad ested in Espagnes.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The subsetting has begun
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: The subsetting has begun
    • From: Bill de hÓra <bill@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
• Next by Date: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Previous by thread: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Next by thread: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread