• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: The subsetting has begun
• From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 17:45:55 -0800
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EEEACF95@h...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EEEACF95@h...>

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

> Question:  how many of you participating in this
> thread have read Tim Bray's XML-SW paper at
> textuality.com?
>
> http://www.textuality.com/xml/xmlSW.html
>
> Perhaps we should, for a strawman's sake, put
> that one proposal on the table here on XML-Dev
> and debate its merits vis a vis our different
> applications.


We could do that.

As for me, I'll stay out of the debate, since
I don't think there's anything worth discussing:
XML-SW is right on the mark.


> My objection to it was including namespaces
> in THE core.  If it is not the core, nevermind;
> it is a good place to start on a subset.

My feeling is, as long as we're stuck with XML Namespaces
to begin with, XML-SW is as good a place as any to put them.


--Joe English

  jenglish@f...

• References:
  • RE: The subsetting has begun
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Next by Date: Re: DOM support in IE vs. NS
• Previous by thread: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Next by thread: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread