• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 17:17:28 -0500
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EEEACF4A@h...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EEEACF4A@h...>
• User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

On Tuesday 18 February 2003 05:01 pm, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> Not exactly although I agree that when using
> XML as The GUI, it looks the same.  The namespace
> should enable me to stay consistent with the
> driving schema.

What if I don't care? What if my system maps Nikon to the appropriate URI 
because I choose to interpret the manufacturer attribute as something 
containing an SOI?

I don't need a *standard* to tell me what a namespace means. What I need is a 
means for dealing with them once I recognize them.

• References:
  • RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Next by Date: RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Next by thread: RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread