• To: robin.berjon@e...
• Subject: Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:10:14 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: code_martial@s... (Tahir Hashmi), xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3E5F9CCB.3060609@e...> from "Robin Berjon" at Feb 28, 2003 06:30:51 PM

Robin Berjon scripsit:

> That's why in BinXML you can specify how you encode your data. In the case you 
> cite one would simply ask that the xs:fooDate type use the UTF-8 codec.

I hope you have SCSU and or BOCU-1 codecs too.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• References:
  • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Next by Date: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Previous by thread: Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
• Next by thread: Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread