• To: "bryan" <bry@i...>,"'Bullard, Claude L (Len)'" <clbullar@i...>
• Subject: Re: On permathreads
• From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@a...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 23:33:30 +0000
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <000201c2dcfd$d19896b0$2001a8c0@bryans>
• References: <000201c2dcfd$d19896b0$2001a8c0@bryans>

On Tuesday 25 February 2003 18:43, bryan wrote:

> Anyway the following here are some not especially bright initial
> thoughts on the subject:
>
> Alaric's making a list, I don't like that idea though, lists require
> human upkeep - in this case one human's upkeep. He probably has lots of
> other things to do with his day.

My plan is to summarise the points and counterpoints, so when somebody brings 
up a permathread, we can just post a URL.

> Many people know what a permathread is, but there are always new people
> coming and posting interesting things that rightfully belong to the
> thread.

The permathread list will be a kind of FAQ, really. But more of a FDP list: 
Frequently Debated Point :-)

ABS

-- 
A city is like a large, complex, rabbit
 - ARP

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: On permathreads
    • From: "bryan" <bry@i...>

• References:
  • RE: On permathreads
    • From: "bryan" <bry@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Next by Date: Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
• Previous by thread: RE: On permathreads
• Next by thread: RE: On permathreads
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread