• To: simonstl@s... (Simon St.Laurent)
• Subject: Re: The subsetting has begun
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:12:46 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1024-ADECCA1348EF11D7A2160003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]> from "Simon St.Laurent" at Feb 25, 2003 01:33:48 PM

Simon St.Laurent scripsit:

> I'm amazed in large part because of the horrible but "technically XML"
> mishmashes I regularly encounter which are quite obviously the result of
> a collision between an internal object structure and the infoset.  It's
> not just one company or even one category of companies - it's pretty
> common.

Can you give examples?

-- 
John Cowan        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan          jcowan@r...
Please leave your values        |       Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.           |          check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel      |            --Cordelia Vorkosigan

• Follow-Ups:
  • collisions (was The subsetting has begun)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • RE: The subsetting has begun
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Next by Date: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Previous by thread: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Next by thread: collisions (was The subsetting has begun)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread