• To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>
• Subject: Re: The subsetting has begun
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill@d...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 09:50:19 +0000
• Cc: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>, "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <clbullar@i...>, xml-dev@l...
• References: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F804B54D33@R...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826

Dare Obasanjo wrote:

> Yep, you're exagerrating. Do you sincerely believe that most XML documents use attributes named 'xmlns' or QNames in a manner inconsistent with the namespaces in XML recommendation? This is counter to my experiences with users of our XML APIs. 

I'm not exagerrating. And what you're saying is irrelevant. XML 
documents without an xmlms attribute on the root doesn't have a 
meaningful XML Infoset. I'll stick my neck and say most XML 
documents are not namespaced.

Bill de hÓra

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The subsetting has begun
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: The subsetting has begun
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• References:
  • RE: The subsetting has begun
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
• Next by Date: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Previous by thread: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Next by thread: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread