• To: "'Dare Obasanjo'" <dareo@m...>, "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: The subsetting has begun
• From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>
• Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 14:24:20 -0800

> Future versions of XML that don't make the infoset a first class
> consideration are refusing to learn from history. For many people who
> use XML, the syntax is incidental but the data model is not. 

If you want to build upon a data model for data interchange, why use one
that's so obviously closely bound to one particular syntax?  Certainly, one
could do better than the Infoset when defining such a model.

• Prev by Date: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Next by Date: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Previous by thread: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Next by thread: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread