• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:23:40 +1100
• References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030215103907.046f26b0@n...-techno logies.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20030215142422.02775720@m...> <5.2.0.9.0.20030215082258.03f498d8@n...-techno logies.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20030213121839.03083488@m...> <5.1.0.14.1.20030218123451.020cad20@localhost>

From: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@a...>

> It seems to me that people are reacting to tone and to the
> presence of people with Other Interests, more than they are
> reacting to the substance of the matter.  

What are these Other Interests?   Do they relate to Certain Things?
Should we react to them with Vague Apprehension or  Nonspecific 
Unsettledness?

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• References:
  • Re: Remembering the original XML vision
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
  • Re: New tool for handling XML in Java
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
  • Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision
    • From: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Next by Date: Re: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision)
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread