[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • To: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>,"Jochen Wiedmann" <joe@i...>
  • Subject: RE: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision)
  • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 12:21:45 -0800
  • Cc: "Kohsuke Kawaguchi" <Kohsuke.Kawaguchi@S...>,<xml-dev@l...>
  • Thread-index: AcLXhaZ+DGchCl8QSG6iiltZHvZ7qwABQrTA
  • Thread-topic: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision)

 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@b...] 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 11:40 AM
> To: Jochen Wiedmann
> Cc: Kohsuke Kawaguchi; xml-dev@l...
> 
> <Excerpt3>
> Why the nonsense with "final" and "block"?
> </Excerpt3>
> 
> Not sure what "nonsense" you mean - these attributes have 
> well-defined and useful application.  The "final" attribute 
> is used to prohibit complex datatype derivation, while the 
> "restriction" attribute is used to prohibit the use of 
> derived complex datatypes.  There are distinct cases in which 
> these are needed.


I'm sorry but the behavior of final & block attributes is nonesensical
and rarely "needed" especially when one considers that few people even
within the W3C XML Schema working group can clearly spell out tell the
difference between final & block on element declarations vs. complex
type definitions. 


-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Identical units which test in an identical fashion will not behave in an
identical fashion in the field.                               

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 

>  
> 

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member