• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try)
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 15:00:56 -0500
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EEEACEC7@h...>

clbullar@i... (Bullard, Claude L (Len)) writes:
>I believe it would look like Tim Bray's XML-SW.

I wouldn't count on that, given the endless hours spent on largely
useless namespace discussions.  Given a chance to start clean, I'd hope
other pathways would be considered.  (And xml:base?  Geez.)

Not that anyone's likely to start clean, of course. 

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• References:
  • RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try)
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative
• Next by Date: Re: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try)
• Previous by thread: RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try)
• Next by thread: Re: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread