• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: The subsetting has begun
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 20:22:11 -0500
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EEEACFB3@h...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EEEACFB3@h...>
• User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

On Tuesday 25 February 2003 05:05 pm, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> >I disagree. As I said at the start of the thread, XML-SW bundles
> > namespaces, xml:space, xml:lang, xml:base and infoset, which I think is a
> > mistake.
>
> Fair enough.  I said it is a place to start.  If all of the subset
> supporters and detractors are arguing about the same document, then that is
> a satisfactory way to begin.  If they can't do that, there is little use in
> beginning.

I understand your desire, but I think it's best to start minimal and build up.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The subsetting has begun
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • RE: The subsetting has begun
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
• Next by Date: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Previous by thread: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Next by thread: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread