• To: veillard@r...
• Subject: Re: Call for information about XML-Fragments
• From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 15:52:00 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <20030225060810.E16255@r...>
• Organization: Expway
• References: <508HBykzY0304S01.1046170310@u...> <20030225060810.E16255@r...>
• Reply-to: robin.berjon@e...
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021126

Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 03:51:50AM -0700, MASSIMILIANO GRANDI wrote:
>>I would like to know what point XML Fragment Interchange W3C Candidate
>>Recommendation (issued on the 12th of February 2001) has got. 
> 
>   Nowhere. Lack of interest and absence of implementations, it just
> stalled :-(

Was there complete lack of interest, or were there other serious issues? I've 
heard of renewed interest in XML Packaging from a number of places, and XML 
Fragments would be quite certainly useful for certain potential packaging 
requirements (eg streaming). I've also seen *very* strong interest in fragments 
from people looking into binary infosets.

-- 
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
Research Engineer, Expway        http://expway.fr/
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Call for information about XML-Fragments
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>

• References:
  • Call for information about XML-Fragments
    • From: MASSIMILIANO GRANDI <massimiliano.grandi@u...>
  • Re: Call for information about XML-Fragments
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>

• Prev by Date: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Next by Date: Re: Call for information about XML-Fragments
• Previous by thread: Re: Call for information about XML-Fragments
• Next by thread: Re: Call for information about XML-Fragments
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread