• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 14:59:27 +1100
• References: <000701c2db85$b7328570$6401a8c0@pcukmka> <uel5yd4r1.fsf@x...> <f0f4r6uedl7.fsf@p...>

From: "K. Ari Krupnikov" <ari@c...> 

> I also keep
> seeing HTML forms where the "country" part of the address is a
> drop-down list, 150-odd long, of all UN members, just because it's
> available. The list ensures only "legal" values can be entered*, but
> it checks for membership in a wrong set -- UN member nations as
> opposed to nations where the site has or wants to have customers. I
> wonder how many sites have users in Afghanistan?

Taiwan, for example, is not a member of the UN.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?
    • From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)

• References:
  • RE: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
  • Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?
    • From: Berend de Boer <berend@x...>
  • Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?
    • From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)

• Prev by Date: Re: Entity declarations and non-validating parsers
• Next by Date: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread