• To: "'hugh_wallis@h...'" <hugh_wallis@h...>
• Subject: RE: Best way to represent fractional values?
• From: "Rodriguez, Sergio" <srodriguez@c...>
• Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:54:10 -0600
• Cc: "'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>
• List-help: <mailto:xml-dev-help@l...>
• List-subscribe: <mailto:xml-dev-subscribe@l...>
• List-unsubscribe: <mailto:xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...>

It's a good idea to include this type (fractional) in WXS...
but, what about the other subset of the Real numbers:

- Rational numbers:  fractional, natural numbers, etc.
- Irational numbers: like Pi (3.14152920...), e (2.71...), etc.

And even more, what about the superset of the Real numbers:
- Imaginary numbers:  like (3i + 43.56).

Even, though, this is one of the reasons we have MathML 2.0...

It would be nice to include a representation of MathML 2.0 within a normal
XML document with WXS... If I'm not mistaken this would be a xml:inlude
(right?).

Cheers,

Sergio Rodríguez.
CANELLA, S. A.
C. A. / GT

• Prev by Date: Re: Microsoft XMLReader
• Next by Date: RE: SML: Second Try
• Previous by thread: Re: Best way to represent fractional values?
• Next by thread: xsi:type and unions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread