• To: "Xml-Dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: SML: Second Try
• From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>
• Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 19:36:00 -0800
• Importance: Normal
• Organization: Docuverse

All,

In the last attempt to simplify XML, two key requirements were a)
compatibility with XML, and b) minimalization.  This time, I removed the
compatibility requirement and shifted to focus to user-friendly syntax:
easier to read and write than XML.  First rought cut of the syntax is
described informally as a blog post.

http://www.docuverse.com/blog/donpark/2003/02/04.html#a200

Please keep in mind that the syntax is incomplete but presented here to
promote discussion and exploration.

Best,

Don Park
Docuverse

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SML: Second Try
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative
• Next by Date: Fwd: web service article
• Previous by thread: WAP/WML/WBXML
• Next by thread: Re: SML: Second Try
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread