• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: The subsetting has begun
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 20:37:24 -0500
• In-reply-to: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F804B54D28@R...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F804B54D28@R...>
• User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

On Monday 24 February 2003 05:12 pm, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> Future versions of XML that don't make the infoset a first class
> consideration are refusing to learn from history. For many people who
> use XML, the syntax is incidental but the data model is not.

In what problem domain? When someone sees

   XML A -> processor XML A'

how can they tell that the transformation occured at an infoset level, or at 
the syntax level?

There are arguably applications where *an* infoset/data model is necessary. 
XML repositories spring to mind as being a good one

• References:
  • RE: The subsetting has begun
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Next by Date: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Previous by thread: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Next by thread: RE: The subsetting has begun
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread