• To: AndrewWatt2000@a..., xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: New tool for handling XML in Java
• From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
• Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 14:16:43 +0000
• In-reply-to: <1f1.1c8a3ae.2b7ceea2@a...>

At 07:50 13/02/2003 -0500, AndrewWatt2000@a... wrote:
>In a message dated 13/02/2003 12:29:28 GMT Standard Time, 
>sean.mcgrath@p... writes:
>
>
>>I'm pretty confidence that those of us who see XML as markup - as
>>*documents* - are
>>in a minority. Such is life. But we were the minority who worked on
>>creating the
>>freaking think in the first place.
>
>
>"Freaking think" ... Interesting term. Is that the W3C analogy to "double 
>think" in George Orwell's 1984? ... Or was it just a Freudian slop? <grin/>

Apologies:-) It should be "freaking thing". Actually, in some parts of the 
UK  the "k" would work for a phonetic rendering.


>It's old age creeping up on you Sean. And in Internet Time too.

Yes. Scary.

Sean

• References:
  • Re: New tool for handling XML in Java
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...

• Prev by Date: Re: Must databinding imply tight coupling? (was Re: New tool for handlingXML in Java)
• Next by Date: RE: Must databinding imply tight coupling? (was Re: New tool for handling XML in Java)
• Previous by thread: Re: New tool for handling XML in Java
• Next by thread: Xalan 2,4,1 URIResolver problems with JDK 1.4.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread