• To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>
• Subject: Re: Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 15:35:21 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F804B54CA1@R...>
• References: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F804B54CA1@R...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130

> I'm impressed by the fact that neither the interviewer nor the
> interviewer seem to be able to tell the difference between strong vs.
> weak typing and static vs. dynamic typing.

Did you miss the part where Guido called it run-time typing, and pointed 
out that everything *is* typed?
	/r$

• References:
  • RE: Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing
• Next by Date: RE: Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing
• Previous by thread: Re: Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing
• Next by thread: RE: Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread